DNAT/SNAT question

Jason Opperisano opie at 817west.com
Fri Apr 15 00:59:04 CEST 2005

On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 03:50:17PM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> You caught another typo, it should have been .3-7.  Also, the prefix
> changes will also help.
> But I'm still concerned / confused about the OUTPUT chain.  We currently
> use the OUTPUT chain for the 1:1 nat.  That seems to work fine on all
> other configurations where we do nat'ing. 
> Our rule is currently "[0:0] -A POSTROUTING -s -j DNAT --to
>" which works fine.  But can we also consolidate this using
> the NETMAP like the pre/post route? 



"Peter: Hey, Brian. If cops are pigs, does that make you a Snausage?
 Brian: Clever, Peter. Did you stay up all night writing that?
 Peter: No, I got to bed around two, two-thirty."
        --Family Guy

More information about the netfilter mailing list