[Bug 1717] New: Listing a set may or may not show the size of a set
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
Wed Oct 25 06:42:11 CEST 2023
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717
Bug ID: 1717
Summary: Listing a set may or may not show the size of a set
Product: nftables
Version: 1.0.x
Hardware: x86_64
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
Reporter: kfm at plushkava.net
Both of the following examples concern the exact same loaded ruleset.
Here is an example of listing a set where the size is not shown.
# nft -t list set netdev filter block_bogons | awk '$1 == "size" { print $1, $2
}'
Here is an example of listing a different set, where the size is shown.
# nft -t list set netdev filter dropped | awk '$1 == "size" { print $1, $2 }'
size 65535
Neither set was defined with an explicit size, which begets the question: why
does nft decide to report the size for one set and yet not the other? I think
that it should behave consistently, perhaps by always including the size.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20231025/77086a08/attachment.html>
More information about the netfilter-buglog
mailing list