[Bug 839] New: SNAT66 does not work for bidirectional UDP
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
Tue Aug 6 12:18:39 CEST 2013
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=839
Summary: SNAT66 does not work for bidirectional UDP
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: NAT
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy: saltyacid at gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Created attachment 410
--> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=410
kernel configuration
Tested on linux 3.10.4 gentoo KVM with iptables v1.4.19.1. I have attached the
kernel configuration file.
Setup SNAT using:
ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j SNAT --to <public_ip6_addr>
Also tested with -p udp and using -s ip6_addr instead of -o but the result is
the same...
We send a packet from COMP1 which is behind NAT and attached to the gentoo
machine performing NAT via eth1, and COMP2 attached via eth2 will reply. When
using TCP or ICMPv6 everything works as expected but with UDP the reply is
dropped by the NAT device. So the first packet, sent from behind NAT is
properly translated and then received by COMP2, but the reply does not leave
netfilter on gentoo machine.
Using conntrack -f ipv6 -L it is possible to see that connection tracking is
set up as expected (but it is marked UNREPLIED - in the IPv4 case it does say
ASSURED).
Any ideas?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the netfilter-buglog
mailing list