[Bug 562] Rule gets implicitly eliminated ("optimized away") --> But that's not ok --> A Logic Bug

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.netfilter.org bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.netfilter.org
Tue Nov 25 20:31:59 CET 2008


http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562


for-openvz at alicewho.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |




------- Comment #4 from for-openvz at alicewho.com  2008-11-25 20:31 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> This does not work:
> 
> > /sbin/iptables -A INPUT --dport 8191 --match recent --name WATCHLIST --set -j
> DROP
> 
> because IT IS NOT A VALID RULE!!!  You CANNOT have a rule which includes a
> "--dport" without ALSO specifying a protocol.  
> 
> Please read the iptables documentation on this, and do not reopen this bug.  It
> is NOT a bug in the code, but a bug in your understanding of how to create
> rules.

Sorry, to say that, but you are talking bullshit, giving a cheap excuse.
Here's another variation of the bug. Here "-p all" was specified.
The result is: IT DOES NOT WORK!
  /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p all --dport 8191 --match recent --name WATCHLIST
--set -j DROP

Ok, forget it you arrogant idiot!
Maybe someone more intelligent than you will fix this bug.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



More information about the netfilter-buglog mailing list