IPset ports question.
Rob Carlson
rcarlson at kitchenandassociates.com
Tue Jul 19 22:58:15 CEST 2005
That did it.
Thanks again, Joszef
Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Rob Carlson wrote:
>
>
>>iptables -A testset -m set --set testset src -j
>>LTREJECT
>>iptables -I FORWARD 2 -i eth1 -j testset
>>iptables -I INPUT 2 -i eth1 -j testset
>>
>>This works fine for blocking all traffic. However
>>since I now want specifically to only drop port 22
>>and port 25 entries (that is most of the nuisance
>>traffic) and allow port 80 for example, I did the
>>following:
>>
>>ipset -N ports portmap --from 1 --to 1024
>>ipset -A ports 22
>>ipset -A ports 25
>>ipset -B testset :default: -b ports
>
>
> You missed to replace the iptables command above with the one
> which instruct the SET target to follow bindings. What you need is
>
> iptables -A testset -m set --set testset src,dst -j LTREJECT
>
> Best regards,
> Jozsef
> -
> E-mail : kadlec at blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec at sunserv.kfki.hu
> PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
> Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
> H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
>
>
--
Rob Carlson, Systems and Network Administrator
Kitchen & Associates Architectural Services, PA
Architecture - Planning - Interior Design
856.854.1880
More information about the netfilter
mailing list