Port forwarding or NAT?
opie at 817west.com
Tue Sep 14 19:13:56 CEST 2004
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 09:32, Eric Geater 9/01/04 wrote:
> I have one crazy machine at our home office that must communicate on
> port 6847 to an outside company. This one machine went through our old
> proxy server until it died last week. We're using IPTABLES through
> rc.firewall-2.4 on a Linux proxy, but it doesn't seem to be allowing
> this communication to occur.
> Would this be handled through port forwarding or NAT?
it would be handled by the FORWARD chain of the filter table, and by a
SNAT/MASQ rule in the POSTROUTING chain of the nat table.
Jason Opperisano <opie at 817west.com>
More information about the netfilter