Licensing Question

[James Morris]

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:

>
> Now, the question is whether the other .c files of the program or module
> which we wrote ourselves and are not derived work needs to be released
> under the GPL. We would alternatively like to release them under a GPL
> compatible license such as MIT X11 or PD. Dually licensing is also fine.
>

Linux kernel modules need to be GPL, as does any userspace program which
links against a GPL library (e.g. libipq).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>