invisible filter...

Matthew Kirkwood matthew@hairy.beasts.org
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:41:22 +0100 (BST)


On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Rune Elvemo wrote:

> Earlier I had heard that -j DROP, was a good solution for making them
> invisible for portscanners, although I did later find out that was
> wrong.
>
> I have also tried various forms of -j REJECT --reject-with <>.

I think we need a -j CLOSED.  Of course, this requires
implementing yet more of a network stack inside iptables.

Matthew.