2.6.23-rc1: ipv4_get_l4proto: Frag of proto 17
kaber at trash.net
Thu Jul 26 13:17:22 CEST 2007
Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Reading the comment in icmp.c iph->frag_off & htons(IP_OFFSET)
> being true means that it's a fragment, but not the first one.
> So what's happening is that the host sends a big UDP packet, it gets
> fragmentated, but never reaches its destination. ICMP error packets
> are generated. Conntrack drops the latter ones thanks to the check in
> So the question is whether those latter ICMP packets should be forwarded
> or not. If not, the code is fine and the warning message could be removed.
> If they should, then it might be hard for the current conntrack code know
> where to send the packet, as the UDP header is missing.
Yes, we can't associate them with the original connection.
We should catch this case in ICMP tracking though I think
instead of removing the message.
More information about the netfilter-devel