An ip_conntrack / nat problem with kernel 2.4.17_mvl21
yasuyuki.kozakai at toshiba.co.jp
Fri Jul 20 13:45:43 CEST 2007
From: "liran tal" <liransgarage at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:50:24 +0200
> Hey everyone,
> I'm using a version of the 2.4.17_mvl21 kernel (from MontaVista
> originally) which was modified by Texas Instruments for their
> additions of some hardware.
> The problem I'm facing is this:
> [computer A: 172.16.0.33] --> [LAN IP: 172.16.0.1 ...linuxbox... WAN
> IP 172.17.1.4] -->[computer B: 172.17.1.44]
> The situation is that a computer on the LAN side of the linux box
> running that kernel with
> an IP of say 172.16.0.33 (computer A) pings a computer behind the WAN
> IP, say computer B with IP of 172.17.1.44
> isn't getting an reply.
> When I started wireshark on computer B to see what's going on I saw
> that it receives icmp echo requests
> from the IP address 172.16.0.33 and tries to reply back which is
> ofcourse totally wrong as it's
> unreachable and what should've happened is that it was supposed to see
> a request from the WAN IP
> 172.17.1.4 and reply to that.
> I can say that anything related to the actual configuration of the
> NAT/Masquerading information
> is irrelevant since it is working with a previous kernel version just fine.
> That previous version we had of this kernel had a problem with
> ip_conntrack or basically a nat problem and the guy who was dealing
> with it before me "solved" it by overwriting some files from kernel
> 2.4.20 vanilla. Files like net/ipv4/netfilter/*
> include/linux/netfilter_arp/* and include/linux/netfilter_ipv4 if I
> can remember correctly.
> Anyway, I can not do the same procedure with this new version of the
> kernel they gave us because the guys at TI inserted some of their own
> code into the networking stack which seems about dealing with qos and
> some files have includes to ti_qos.h etc
> I'm really looking for a lead on which files to look at exactly and what
> should I be exactly looking for?
> If anyone has any idea how to approach this or any leads
> I'll appreciate that very much.
I have no idea. But if I was you, I would try main line kernel 2.4.17 on
other machine if thre is no difference between them (maybe what you should
see are ip_conntrack_*.c and ip_nat_*.c in net/ipv4/netfilter), look for
changes at following if the kernel 2.4.17 has same problem,
and try related fix. If the recent kernel (2.4.33) had same
problem, I would make a patch to fix or report it on this list.
We don't usually take care of distro's customized kernel, so I recommend
to ask Montavista guys or TI guys about details.
-- Yasuyuki Kozakai
More information about the netfilter-devel