[PATCH 2.6.20 07/10] nfnetlink_log: fix module
reference counting
Patrick McHardy
kaber at trash.net
Wed Feb 14 17:46:38 CET 2007
Micha³ Miros³aw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>I think we should just cancel the timer on destruction.
>
>
> It won't solve a race between destroying the instance and logging a
> packet. It could happen that:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> nfulnl_log_packet()
> -> instance_lookup_get()
> -> lock inst
> ** got lock on inst
> _instance_destroy(inst)
> -> remove inst from list
> -> remove timer and unref inst
> -> lock inst
> -> start a timer
> -> unlock inst
> ** got lock on inst
> -> clear the skb
> -> unlock inst
> -> unref inst
> -> unref module... but we still have a timer pending!
This is easily fixable by adding a synchronize_rcu() call
after removing the instance from the global list.
nfulnl_log_packet() is called within a RCU read-side
critical section, so once synchronize_rcu() returns we're
guaranteed no CPU is within nfulnl_log_packet anymore with
this instance. And I think it is really preferable to having
the timer armed after destroying the instance.
This patch should take care of both the module reference
problem and the refcount leak.
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
index 8a460b1..1d45ff6 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
@@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ _instance_destroy2(struct nfulnl_instanc
if (lock)
write_unlock_bh(&instances_lock);
+ sychronize_rcu();
+ if (del_timer_sync(&inst->timer))
+ instance_put(inst);
/* then flush all pending packets from skb */
spin_lock_bh(&inst->lock);
@@ -363,9 +366,6 @@ __nfulnl_send(struct nfulnl_instance *in
{
int status;
- if (timer_pending(&inst->timer))
- del_timer(&inst->timer);
-
if (!inst->skb)
return 0;
@@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ #endif
* enough room in the skb left. flush to userspace. */
UDEBUG("flushing old skb\n");
+ if (del_timer(&inst->timer))
+ instance_put(inst);
+
__nfulnl_send(inst);
}
More information about the netfilter-devel
mailing list