bunk at stusta.de
Tue Feb 21 03:00:12 CET 2006
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:17:32AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Arnaldo apparently wants to fix it differently, but maybe you could help
> us with conntrack :) CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK and CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK
> should be mutually exclusive. Specifying
> depends on CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=n
> depends on CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK=n
> will avoid asking for NF_CONNTRACK when IP_NF_CONNTRACK is set, but not
> the other way around.
Even worse, kconfig will complain about a circular dependency.
depends on CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK=n
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK will be visible if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is set,
but as soon as CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK is set, CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is
automatically set to n.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
More information about the netfilter-devel