[PATCH 4/4] first conntrack ID must be 1 not 2

[Harald Welte]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:44:56PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Me neither :) I was just pointing out the idea behind the ID, not
> necessarily condoning it. After discussing it with Rusty in Sevilla,
> it became clear that we can provide guarantees similar to filesystems
> without it, which seems to be good enough. So I have absolutely
> nothing against removing it. In fact, IIRC the last discussion
> stopped after I had sent a patch to remove it. I need to dig out that
> patch again :)

I didn't contribute to any of these discussions anymore, since I already
made my opinion on this quite clear very early on:  I don't have any
problem whatsoever with non-uniqueness ;)

So if there's now a majority of people who want to delete the ID: Go for
it :)

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at netfilter.org>                 http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20060401/dfd95ac9/attachment.pgp