problem with conntrack utility and kernel 2.6.14
Deti Fliegl
deti at fliegl.de
Fri Oct 28 21:53:31 CEST 2005
Pablo Neira wrote:
> Thanks for the very detailed report. The patch fixes some aligment
> issues that I didn't handle properly :(. Please, give a try to the patch
> attached and tell if it fixes your problem.
Thanks for the patch (which seemed to be already checked into svn) -
conntrack now works properly - no seg faults occured :)
The kernel oops still happens - but this time I had access to the
console (hope that helps):
<4>Badness in __kfree_skb at net/core/skbuff.c:330
<4>
<4>Call Trace:<ffffffff802a2f77>{__kfree_skb+167}
<ffffffff802bb597>{netlink_recvmsg+279}
<4> <ffffffff8029cb2b>{sock_recvmsg+315}
<ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<4> <ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<ffffffff8015d828>{filemap_nopage+424}
<4> <ffffffff8013003b>{try_to_wake_up+1083}
<ffffffff8014b2f0>{autoremove_wake_function+0}
<4> <ffffffff8025bbd9>{pty_write+89}
<ffffffff8029e38b>{sys_recvmsg+395}
<4> <ffffffff80130f23>{__wake_up+67} <ffffffff80181208>{vfs_write+344}
<4> <ffffffff80181343>{sys_write+83}
<ffffffff8010dc4e>{system_call+126}
<4>
<3>scheduling while atomic: conntrack/0xffffff00/7887
<4>
<4>Call Trace:<ffffffff8031d67d>{schedule+125}
<ffffffff80181208>{vfs_write+344}
<4> <ffffffff80181343>{sys_write+83}
<ffffffff8010dcb8>{sysret_careful+13}
<4>
<4>Badness in __kfree_skb at net/core/skbuff.c:330
<4>
<4>Call Trace:<ffffffff802a2f77>{__kfree_skb+167}
<ffffffff802bb597>{netlink_recvmsg+279}
<4> <ffffffff8029cb2b>{sock_recvmsg+315}
<ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<4> <ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<ffffffff8013578d>{printk+141}
<4> <ffffffff8014b2f0>{autoremove_wake_function+0}
<ffffffff8025bbd9>{pty_write+89}
<4> <ffffffff8029e38b>{sys_recvmsg+395}
<ffffffff8018e477>{pipe_writev+1319}
<4> <ffffffff80181208>{vfs_write+344} <ffffffff80181343>{sys_write+83}
<4> <ffffffff8010dc4e>{system_call+126}
<4>Badness in __kfree_skb at net/core/skbuff.c:330
<4>
<4>Call Trace:<ffffffff802a2f77>{__kfree_skb+167}
<ffffffff802bb597>{netlink_recvmsg+279}
<4> <ffffffff8029cb2b>{sock_recvmsg+315}
<ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<4> <ffffffff8025a4d8>{n_tty_receive_buf+4392}
<ffffffff8013578d>{printk+141}
<4> <ffffffff8014b2f0>{autoremove_wake_function+0}
<ffffffff8025bbd9>{pty_write+89}
<4> <ffffffff8029e38b>{sys_recvmsg+395}
<ffffffff8018e477>{pipe_writev+1319}
<4> <ffffffff80181208>{vfs_write+344} <ffffffff80181343>{sys_write+83}
<4> <ffffffff8010dc4e>{system_call+126}
... etc...
More information about the netfilter-devel
mailing list