[PATCH] CTA_PROTO_NUM is u_int8_t not u_int16_t (was Re:
CTA_PROTO_NUM u_int8_t or u_int16_t)
kaber at trash.net
Wed Nov 30 00:07:49 CET 2005
Harald Welte wrote:
> No, I oppose any kind of kernel version number checking. I'd rather
> break 2.6.14 with new versions of the userspace.
The stable tree has a couple of patches pending, so I guess there
will be another release. I'll ask them if they would take a patch
to fix this issue.
More information about the netfilter-devel