[PATCH] CTA_PROTO_NUM is u_int8_t not u_int16_t (was Re: CTA_PROTO_NUM u_int8_t or u_int16_t)

[Patrick McHardy]

Harald Welte wrote:
> No, I oppose any kind of kernel version number checking.  I'd rather
> break 2.6.14 with new versions of the userspace.
> 

The stable tree has a couple of patches pending, so I guess there
will be another release. I'll ask them if they would take a patch
to fix this issue.