iptables-batch 2nd try
Harald Welte
laforge at netfilter.org
Mon May 9 11:02:44 CEST 2005
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:56:03AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
>
> > My main objective is that the functionality between iptables-restore and
> > iptables-batch is pretty much the same. I think either a converter
> > before iptables-restore, or modifications to iptables-restore would be a
> > better way.
>
> There isn't much code to share between iptables-restore and
> iptables-batch. Although the functionality is similar they work
> differently.
The question would then rather be: why is there no code share since the
functionality is similar? ;)
I'm honestly interested in the technical reasons.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge at netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20050509/2b0839f7/attachment.bin
More information about the netfilter-devel
mailing list