iptables-batch 2nd try

Harald Welte laforge at netfilter.org
Mon May 9 11:02:44 CEST 2005


On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:56:03AM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> 
> > My main objective is that the functionality between iptables-restore and
> > iptables-batch is pretty much the same.  I think either a converter
> > before iptables-restore, or modifications to iptables-restore would be a
> > better way.
> 
> There isn't much code to share between iptables-restore and
> iptables-batch. Although the functionality is similar they work
> differently.
 
The question would then rather be: why is there no code share since the
functionality is similar? ;)

I'm honestly interested in the technical reasons.  

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at netfilter.org>                 http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20050509/2b0839f7/attachment.bin


More information about the netfilter-devel mailing list