[Patch] ip{, 6}tables-restore -n with existing user defined chain

[Patrick McHardy]

Harald Welte wrote:
> It seems fine to me, but we alwasy need to be cautious with silently
> changing semantics that people might rely on...  
> 
> but please apply...

Thanks for your feedback. Charlie, your patch doesn't apply, apparently
because of whitespace issues:

patching file ip6tables-restore.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 233.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ip6tables-restore.c.rej
patching file iptables-restore.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 236.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file iptables-restore.c.rej

Please resend as attachment.

Regards
Patrick