6}tables-restore -n with existing user defined chain
kaber at trash.net
Sun Jun 12 15:38:14 CEST 2005
Harald Welte wrote:
> It seems fine to me, but we alwasy need to be cautious with silently
> changing semantics that people might rely on...
> but please apply...
Thanks for your feedback. Charlie, your patch doesn't apply, apparently
because of whitespace issues:
patching file ip6tables-restore.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 233.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ip6tables-restore.c.rej
patching file iptables-restore.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 236.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file iptables-restore.c.rej
Please resend as attachment.
More information about the netfilter-devel