nf_conntrack [was Re: [PATCH 1/4] RFC: fast string matching infrastrure for netfilter]

[Patrick McHardy]

Harald Welte wrote:

>>Does that mean I should *not* send the expectation and NAT patches to
>>DaveM now?  (Posted before the ct_extend patches):
>>
>
>I was wondering all the time why we keep talking about maintainance mode
>for ip_conntrack and the coincidential spike in new development for
>ip_conntrack.
>
>I think if we push it into ip_conntrack, we need to make sure
>nf_conntrack is in sync at the same time - otherwise poor Yasuyuki has
>to (again) sync all the changes... I think he did that often enough...
>
I'm willing to take care of this after Rusty's patches are in.

Regards
Patrick