laforge at netfilter.org
Sat Sep 25 09:00:01 CEST 2004
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:04:36PM -0400, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > > As stated before, we could also move it to
> > > svn.netfilter.org (which actually exists, but also has no public
> > > interface yet).
> > Jeremy?
> This would probably be the best way to go - It also depends on how the
> netfilter testsuite is going to be developed - would using the subversion
> repository cause any problems, rather than rolling it into netfilter cvs?
no, I think that would be a good idea. I'm actually thinking about
moving the re-organized [as discussed at the netfilter workshop]
patch-o-matic-ng into svn anyway... if only for the single reason that
it allows recursive directory-adding (anybody who has added stuff to pom
CVS knows what I'm talking about).
I'll send you notice when svn.netfilter.org is up and running as
I've successfully tested certificate-based client authentication with
svn.gnumonks.org, so I think that's the way to go for developer access.
It's the only strongly authenticated way where you still have the power
to have permissions on per-user granularity.
> In the meantime though, I've set up a cron task to create a nightly snapshot
> from the ozlabs.org subversion repository (23:00 AEST). This puts the .tar.gz
> up at:
- Harald Welte <laforge at netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/netfilter-devel/attachments/20040925/c3c8986f/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the netfilter-devel