[1/1] OSF: pom-ng - linux-2.6.

Patrick McHardy kaber at trash.net
Wed Dec 8 19:48:44 CET 2004


Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:58 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>  
>
>>Since OSF originally was created in 2.5 environment 
>>it is strange not to have 2.6 support for OSF.
>>This(similar) patch was sent some time ago but was lost.
>>Please apply.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol at 2ka.mipt.ru>
>>    
>>
>
>My dear hands, please contact my brain before doing anything.
>Thanks.
>  
>
And I need to read first before complaining :)

>Proper patch attached.
>  
>
Still doesn't apply, it seems to be present already. The latest
change was two month ago.

~/src/nf/svn/netfilter/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng$ patch -p1 </tmp/pom.diff  
--dry-run
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file osf/info
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file osf/info.rej
The next patch would create the file 
osf/linux-2.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_osf.h,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file 
osf/linux-2.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_osf.h.rej
The next patch would create the file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_osf.c,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_osf.c.rej
The next patch would create the file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig.ladd,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig.ladd.rej
The next patch would create the file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile.ladd,
which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file 
osf/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile.ladd.rej

Anyhow, it still needs to handle non-linear skbs. Have a look
at the other matches and their use of skb_header_pointer.

Regards
Patrick



More information about the netfilter-devel mailing list