debug and notrack tables - proposal and questions
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:40:50 +0200
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:21:30PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:21:03PM +0200, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> > > Well. As for the naming, I'd say:
> > > - UNTRACKED for the state name (ESTABLISHED,RELATED,INVALID,UNTRACKED)
> > > - notrack for the table name
> > > - NOTRACK for the target name
> > Why not simply PRETRACK, or PRECONNTRACK ?
> > It would be coherent with the existing naming...
> PRETRACK for which of the three?
Oh, sorry... I was thinking about the chain name. I guess we need
one, right ?
PRECONNTRACK(ING) is analoguous to PREROUTING, for example.
(°= Hervé Eychenne
v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/