debug and notrack tables - proposal and questions

[Harald Welte]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:21:03PM +0200, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> 
> > Well. As for the naming, I'd say:
> > - UNTRACKED for the state  name (ESTABLISHED,RELATED,INVALID,UNTRACKED)
> > - notrack for the table name
> > - NOTRACK for the target name
> 
> Why not simply PRETRACK, or PRECONNTRACK ?
> It would be coherent with the existing naming...

PRETRACK for which of the three?  You are writing uppercase so it can only be
the state name or the target name.

A state name of PRETRACK doesn't make sense to me.  PRETRACK references
to a location, not to a state.  Same with the target name.

>  RV

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org               http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ 
V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)