<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:phil@nwl.cc" title="Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>"> <span class="fn">Phil Sutter</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - noflush actually flushes in case of custom chain"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242">bug 1242</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>phil@nwl.cc
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - noflush actually flushes in case of custom chain"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - noflush actually flushes in case of custom chain"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242">bug 1242</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:phil@nwl.cc" title="Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>"> <span class="fn">Phil Sutter</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>While the behaviour indeed seems odd, the few lines of code in question are a
tad too obvious to be a mistake. So I started to wonder, what is the point of
specifying the chain line in restore --noflush input? If you don't want the
chain to be flushed, you could just omit that line.
Am I missing something? Right now I'm tempted to close this as NOTABUG, because
the behaviour seems intentional (albeit under-documented).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>