<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Define set of set with in ipset list:sets"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Define set of set with in ipset list:sets"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1687">bug 1687</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:willyam.android@gmail.com" title="wcts <willyam.android@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">wcts</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Phil Sutter from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=1687#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Not planned per se. If you use anonymous sets, they are merged
> automatically. E.g.:
>
> ip saddr { { 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2 }, { 3.3.3.3, 4.4.4.4 } }
>
> The example is non-sense, but you may use defines to "refer" to sets in a
> rule.
>
> A classic workaround for your example rule though is:
>
> ip6 saddr @FR drop
> ip6 saddr @MC drop
> ip6 saddr @CH drop
>
> You could put this into a separate chain for convenience.</span >
Right, if i went by example separate per continent, i would have to create
multiples rules. In the ipset we have the type "list", so I ask if there is any
implementation plan from lists with available in ipset.
I understand that in this example case I could create a list with the multiple
countries that make up the continent. But it would be very useful to reuse the
sets already instanced in nftables and just reference them directly in a single
rule instead of applying multiple rules.
Thanks for attention.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>