<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - nft reset quotas does not reset anonymous quotas"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1314#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - nft reset quotas does not reset anonymous quotas"
href="https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1314">bug 1314</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:pablo@netfilter.org" title="Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>"> <span class="fn">Pablo Neira Ayuso</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to kfm from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=1314#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Florian Westphal from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=1314#c1">comment #1</a>)
> > Pablo, any suggestion?
> > I think that resetting anon counter/quotas too makes sense,
> > at least I'd expect it to work that way.
>
> I found this after filing <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Discretely resetting anonymous counters is impossible"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=1401">bug 1401</a> and am very much in agreement. I don't
> use quotas but I've made some suggestions in said bug that are probably as
> relevant to quotas as they are to counters.</span >
They question is if we want to have a fine grain to reset anonymous stateful
information, or just 'nft reset ruleset' to reset all stateful information
(including quotas and counters) is fine.
What would you prefer?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>