[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.

bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
Mon Jul 8 23:33:09 CEST 2013


--- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST ---
As noted, #2 is solved already.  Also, /128 will no longer print (commit

But your #1 makes little sense to me:  discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22.  How
do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a
/22 mask?  What if they get assigned a new /24 net tomorrow, and add an IP from
that /24 to the DNS RR?  Then your rule addition is no longer valid.  What you
are attempting to do ultimately sounds like a bad idea, and not one that we
should hack around to support.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.

More information about the netfilter-buglog mailing list